Conductor vs cmux
Conductor and cmux both let you run several AI coding agents at once. Conductor is a native macOS app focused on Claude Code with a graphical worktree UI. cmux is an open-source TUI in the spirit of tmux. If you want a more complete graphical workspace with 30+ agents, a built-in editor, browser, and code review, look at Agentastic.
Who should choose each option
Conductor
Choose Conductor for a focused native macOS UI around Claude Code worktrees.
cmux
Choose cmux if you want an open-source terminal multiplexer for agents.
Feature comparison
| Conductor | cmux | |
|---|---|---|
| Form factor | Native macOS GUI | Terminal multiplexer |
| Agent focus | Claude Code first | Any CLI agent |
| Worktree per agent | Yes | Optional |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Cross-platform | macOS only | macOS / Linux |
Pricing
Conductor
Free.
cmux
Free / open source.
Using them together
Most teams pick one. If you want broader agent support (30+ agents) plus a built-in editor, browser, and code review, see Agentastic.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more popular — Conductor or cmux?
They serve different audiences. Conductor for Claude-Code-heavy macOS users; cmux for terminal-first cross-platform users.
What's an alternative to both?
Agentastic — a native macOS workspace with 30+ agent integrations, worktree-per-agent isolation, and a built-in editor / browser / diff viewer.
See also
Agentastic vs Conductor
Compare Agentastic and Conductor. Both run multiple Claude Code agents in parallel on macOS. Agentastic ships …
Agentastic vs cmux
Compare Agentastic and cmux. cmux is an open-source tmux-style multiplexer for AI coding agents. Agentastic is…
Agentastic vs Claude Code
Compare Agentastic and Claude Code. Claude Code is Anthropic's CLI agent. Agentastic is a native macOS workspa…